President Trump is 100% right to keep the Epstein Files sealed — or better yet, destroy them permanently.
America is under direct attack from China, Globalist networks, and hostile foreign intelligence agencies. These files are a loaded kompromat weapon — cultivated by spies, enabled by China-backed globalist media, and deliberately designed to divide and destroy the United States from within.
This was never just a sex scandal. It was a honey trap intelligence operation by China/Globalists designed to ensnare key public figures. Once caught on camera, those images or allegations could be used to control decisions, sabotage alliances, and compromise national security for decades.
America is family — and like all families, we have fights. But when the wolf is at the door, family stands and fights together.
WHO WERE THE VISITORS
The guest list was a cross-section of high-profile figures — Democrats, Republicans, diplomats, CEOs, financiers, celebrities, royals. Many were good patriotic Americans who had no part in Epstein’s crimes.
For most, the island was sold as an escape from the relentless demands of public life — a place to relax, network, and party. Events included charity fundraisers, private concerts, intimate dinners, and networking sessions where no sexual misconduct occurred. Many guests never even met Epstein directly. So it is not fair to paint them with the same brush stroke as Epstein.
The average American can go to Vegas and cut loose knowing “what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.” Those in the public eye don’t get that luxury — and for many, Epstein’s properties were marketed as that kind of sanctuary.
NATIONAL SECURITY
Unsealing the Epstein files now would be the single greatest “divide and conquer” gift America could hand to its enemies. Both Republicans and Democrats would be caught in the crossfire, and the only winners would be China/Globalist operatives embedded in U.S. media.
These files almost certainly contain unverified allegations, planted kompromat, and possibly fabricated situations and intelligence. Hostile services already run honey traps worldwide. Handing them thousands of pages of names and accusations — true, false, or manufactured — would give them decades of leverage over America’s leadership.
The collateral damage would be enormous: innocent people whose only “crime” was appearing on a flight log or attending a dinner would be smeared without evidence.
The smart path is to cut a deal with Maxwell — secure a controlled release of verified intelligence, pursue sealed indictments against actual offenders, and protect the innocent. Sealed legal processes can remove predators without giving the enemy an unlimited arsenal of blackmail material.
THE EPSTEIN CASE AND THE WOMEN
The reality is far more complex than the media’s victim-only narrative.
Many of Epstein’s accusers were of legal age in the jurisdiction where alleged events occurred — Florida’s age of consent is 18, New York’s is 17, and the UK’s is 16. Recruitment was often peer-to-peer, not mass abductions. In some cases, girls deliberately lied about their age and even told others to claim they were 18 — a fact captured in Netflix’s own footage. The majority of the women were already working in prostitution long before meeting Epstein, even those underage.
Many of those had continued consensual encounters with Epstein for many months or years, returning voluntarily for parties, drugs, and sex with multiple partners. None were kidnapped off the street or forced.
Because of this, only two witnesses in the original 2008 Florida case were deemed credible enough for prosecution:
- Virginia Giuffre (then Virginia Roberts) – Corroborated by travel records and consistent timelines. She claimed she was recruited at Mar-a-Lago by Ghislaine Maxwell at age 16 and alleged sexual encounters with Epstein and others. The problem was she stayed with Epstein and Maxwell for years, willingly traveling with them internationally and having consensual sex with countless others. She later received multi-million-dollar settlements, which raised questions about motive.
- “Jane Doe” (later identified as Courtney Wild) – Already engaged in commercial sex work before meeting Epstein, and admitted in later interviews that she had been recruited into sex work by peers while still underage. She had a history of drug use prior to her involvement with Epstein, something the defense could argue affected memory and credibility. Like several others, she returned to Epstein’s residences multiple times after the first encounter — which prosecutors knew would weaken the perception of coercion.
The majority of other accusers had credibility problems — inconsistent timelines, pre-existing sex work, drug abuse, and voluntary returns to Epstein’s circle for months or years — all of which undermine the “pure victim” theory.
Given this context, the 2008 plea deal brokered by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta — which resulted in Epstein serving jail time for solicitation — was the most viable option to secure some level of justice while avoiding the collapse of the case at trial. Acosta later resigned as U.S. Labor Secretary under political pressure for making that deal — yet in the cold light of the evidence available at the time, it was the only path to guaranteed jail time, offender registration, and restitution.
THE NETFLIX DOC
Netflix’s Filthy Rich was designed to deliver outrage-ready television — not truth. It packaged selective facts, omitted inconvenient details, and reworked timelines to fit a one-dimensional “pure victim” narrative.
The lead detective in the Palm Beach investigation openly stated:
“Some women were happy to cooperate, others were in love with Epstein, and still others went on to college and refused to speak with police.”
That single quote undermines the idea of universal victimhood — yet Netflix buried it in the noise. The documentary even shows underage prostitutes coaching each other to lie about their ages — no different from teens helping each other get fake IDs to sneak into a club. This was a private setting, not a nightclub, and generally, no one would be carding at the door.
The credibility gap widens with Maria Farmer, portrayed as a heroic whistleblower. Omitted entirely was the fact that Farmer photographed and painted her own underage sisters nude — selling those works for tens of thousands of dollars. Even more disturbing, during one Netflix interview, Farmer sits in front of a painting she created depicting a lesbian couple, with one woman’s hands cupping the breasts of a young girl. What’s more, Maria Farmer herself publicly stated that the only time she met Donald Trump, he immediately walked away after being told she was 16 — a key detail undermining any insinuation of misconduct, but conveniently absent from Netflix’s narrative.
The documentary also never addresses how Annie Farmer, underage at the time, was modeling nude for her sister’s photos and paintings — nor whether she received money from the sale of those works. It further ignores that Annie profited after the Epstein scandal through compensation payouts and by launching a boot brand called The Annies built on the notoriety. This glaring omission — which raises legitimate questions about her own moral standing — was whitewashed to preserve the simplistic narrative. (What’s next — The Panties?)
The series also avoided the broader cultural backdrop: industries like fashion and music have long sexualized underage teens, blurring age boundaries decades before Epstein. From Brooke Shields in Blue Lagoon to an underage Kate Moss in provocative ad campaigns, the sexualization of minors was normalized in pop culture well before Epstein. Acknowledging this would have undercut the idea that his circle alone created the problem.
Instead, Filthy Rich cherry-picked timelines, sanitized certain accusers’ pasts, and vilified others for lesser behavior — crafting a carefully controlled outrage product, not an honest record. Watching the documentary with the sound off and only reading the captions gives a far clearer picture of the deliberate timeline rewrites and factual inaccuracies.
GHISLAINE
Ghislaine Maxwell is the operational key to the entire network — the gatekeeper who knows the timelines, property layouts, surveillance setups, and exactly which encounters were consensual versus criminal. If anyone holds the blueprint of Epstein’s operation, it’s her. She is not just an accomplice; she is potentially the single most valuable intelligence asset in this case.
In her trial, prosecutors presented four witnesses:
- Annie Farmer – Never alleged any sex act beyond Maxwell touching her buttocks and sides of her breasts during a massage.
- Virginia Giuffre – Above the UK age of consent, traveled internationally for consensual encounters with multiple partners, and later received a multi-million-dollar settlement from Prince Andrew. The age of consent is 16 in the UK, and she told Andrew she was 17.
- Carolyn – Already involved in prostitution before ever meeting Epstein.
- Kate – Over the age of consent, yet still awarded $5 million in settlement.
These accounts — while damaging in the court of public opinion — do not prove the existence of the massive “global underage trafficking” network as often portrayed in the media. Instead, they represent a selective cross-section that leaves out critical context, timelines, and the number of encounters that were fully consensual under the law.
The smart move now is to offer Maxwell sentence modification in exchange for full, sworn, sealed testimony; all photos, videos, financial records, and contact logs; and maps/inventories of every surveillance setup and storage location. This would allow investigators to surgically separate genuine predators from consensual participants, protecting the innocent while prosecuting the guilty.
Every cooperation agreement should be sealed to prevent political detonation and media circus trials — which would only deepen divisions. The longer Maxwell remains silent, the greater the risk that the real predators stay free, while others are wrongly smeared for consensual, legal encounters.
CONCLUSION
Keeping the files sealed is not about shielding predators — it’s about protecting the greatest nation on earth, the United States of America. National security outweighs public voyeurism. The guilty can be prosecuted without further destroying America and innocent lives in the process — especially when our enemies are far worse.
Any legitimate wrongdoing can and should be dealt with in private, closed legal proceedings if needed, ensuring justice is served while shielding innocent parties from permanent reputational destruction.
Releasing the files in full would hand America’s enemies the perfect blackmail arsenal, destabilizing allies and fracturing our own ranks. The only responsible course — and the one President Trump must be open and forthright about to stop internal division and secure the midterms — is exactly this: seal the files, make a deal with Maxwell, and control the fallout.
Final line: Don’t destroy America and the innocent to catch the guilty — especially when our enemies are far worse.
